linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i.MX pwm patches
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:05:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120831130502.GR26594@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120830214547.GC3613@r65073-Latitude-D630>

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:45:49AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:48:15PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > The following patches are an overdue work on the i.MX pwm driver.
> > 
> > - introduce SoC specific functions to make the driver easier to maintain
> > - use peripheral clock for pwm output unconditionally
> > - separate the two clocks this module has
> > - enable ipg clock for register accesses, peripheral clock for enabling
> >   the pwm
> > - make the driver safe for calling pwm_config before pwm_enable
> > - Add devicetree support for i.MX53
> > 
> > The platform device support is still implemented using cpu_is_*, I think
> > this can be dropped completely soon
> 
> Anything stops us from doing this right now?  The bonus point of
> cleaning this is that we can remove the #include <mach/hardware.h>
> from the driver, which is helpful for single-kernel project.

The pwm driver currently has no in kernel user, so I'd say yes.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-31 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 11:48 i.MX pwm patches Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] pwm i.MX: factor out SoC specific functions Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] pwm i.MX: remove unnecessary if in pwm_[en|dis]able Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] pwm i.MX: add functions to enable/disable pwm Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] pwm i.MX: Use module_platform_driver Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:26   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] pwm i.MX: use per clock unconditionally Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] pwm i.MX: fix clock lookup Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM i.MX53: Add pwms to dtsi Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:32   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-31 13:07     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-31  0:16       ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-07 13:29       ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-07 17:26         ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 20:10           ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Sascha Hauer
2012-08-30 22:28   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-30 21:45 ` i.MX pwm patches Shawn Guo
2012-08-31 13:05   ` Sascha Hauer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120831130502.GR26594@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).