From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:43:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v6 10/10] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: generic timing calculation In-Reply-To: References: <20120824194630.GU11011@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20120906204354.GJ1303@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Mohammed, Afzal [120906 00:40]: > Hi Tony, > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:04:10, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > This hangs n800 during the boot. > > Paul reported that n800 stopped booting on OMAP baseline [1] > due to an mmc issue and has posted a solution [2]. > > Are you facing the same issue ?, if so, then it is not > due to this series. No that's a separate issue. Your series works except for this patch makes thing hang. Regards, Tony > I tried to get an n800, but has been unsuccessful. > > Regards > Afzal > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=134685988517580&w=2 > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg190879.html > > > > > > > > Shall I read the above as n800 boot without patch 10/10, > > > but with the other patches in this series ? > > > > > > As per the board file, n800 has tusb6010 as well as > > > OneNAND in sync read & async write mode, was OneNAND > > > working without 10/10. > > > > > > Do you have any idea, which timing could have gone wrong, > > > can you please sent me DEBUG enabled gpmc log with and > > > without 10/10. > > > > Can you please sent me GPMC DEBUG enabled logs with and > > without this series. >