linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Converting OMAP's custom vram allocator
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:55:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906205514.GN1303@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346839733.32747.1.camel@deskari>

* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> [120905 03:09]:
> Hi,
> 
> OMAP has a custom video ram allocator, which I'd like to remove and use
> the standard dma allocation functions.
> 
> There are two problems for which I'd like to hear suggestions or
> comments:
> 
> First one is that the dma_alloc_* functions map the allocated memory for
> cpu use. In many cases with OMAP DSS (display subsystem) this is not
> needed: the memory may be written only by the SGX or the DSP, and it's
> only read by the DSS, so it's never touched by the CPU.
> 
> This is even more true when using VRFB on omap3 (and probably TILER on
> omap4) for rotation, as VRFB hides the actual memory and offers rotated
> views. In this case the backend memory is never accessed by anyone else
> than VRFB.
> 
> Is there a way to allocate the memory without creating a mapping? While
> it won't break anything as such, the allocated areas can be quite large
> thus causing large areas of the kernel's memory space to be needlessly
> reserved.
> 
> The second case is passing a framebuffer address from the bootloader to
> the kernel. Often with mobile devices the bootloader will initialize the
> display hardware, showing a company logo or such. To keep the image on
> the screen when kernel starts we need to reserve the same physical
> memory area early at boot, and use that for the framebuffer.
> 
> I'm not sure if there's any actual problem with this one, presuming
> there is a solution for the first case. Somehow the memory is reserved
> at early boot time, and this is passed to the fb driver. But can the
> memory be managed the same way as in normal case (for example freeing
> it), or does it need to be handled as a special case?

Sounds like you might be able to do this all with CMA with some
additional patches?

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-05 10:08 Converting OMAP's custom vram allocator Tomi Valkeinen
2012-09-06 20:55 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-09-06 21:35 ` Rob Clark
2012-09-07  5:55 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-09-07 10:54   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-09-14 14:10     ` Marek Szyprowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120906205514.GN1303@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).