From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@ti.com (Mike Turquette) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:55:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCHv5 9/9] arm: vt8500: clk: Add Common Clock Framework support In-Reply-To: <1347337955.2134.3.camel@gitbox> References: <1346626896-23070-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <20120910211209.20289.6795@nucleus> <1347337955.2134.3.camel@gitbox> Message-ID: <20120911175541.20289.95694@nucleus> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Tony Prisk (2012-09-10 21:32:35) > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:12 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Tony Prisk (2012-09-02 16:01:36) > > > This patch adds common clock framework support for arch-vt8500. > > > Support for PLL and device clocks on VT8500, WM8505 and WM8650 > > > are included. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk > > > --- > > > Changes made as per Mike's review. > > > Split endisable() into enable/disable. > > > Style tidy up - remove extra blank lines. > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > This looks good. I've taken it into clk-next for some testing. > > > > Regards, > > Mike > > Presumably this patch wouldn't apply cleanly unless you also added patch > 6/9. Can you let me know how you handled it so I can work with Arnd to > get all the other patches in through arm-soc. > I see no dependency between patch #9 and #6. This patch simply introduces a new C file and adds an entry into drivers/clk/Makefile. Am I missing something? Also, I did not push my clk-next branch out publicly last night with this change so it is no problem for me to drop it. Would you prefer the whole series go through arm-soc? If so this patch has my: Acked-by: Mike Turquette Regards, Mike > Regards, > Tony P