linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] i2c: at91: cleanup and dt support
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:16:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120912101607.GA2624@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505041EF.5060204@atmel.com>

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 08:42 AM, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com :
> > From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This set of patches is based on Nikolaus at91_i2c driver.
> > 
> > Changes:
> > v3:
> >   - only put multi-drive lines in the if...else statement (suggested
> >   by Warner Losh)
> 
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> As said by Ludovic, this series goes on top of Nikolaus' one.
> My Acked-by is already set on this one, so I think that I have nothing
> more to do ;-)
> 
> BTW, in case you need help to sort all this, do not hesitate to contact
> us... we can setup a git tree for this...

I think I am fine. Patches look good. I wondered a bit about first
removing the old driver, then adding the new one with regard to
bisectability. But as the old driver depends on BROKEN, I think this is
OK to do.

One thing I'd like to make, though. I'd like to squash the following
patches into one:

	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver
	i2c: at91: use managed resources
	i2c: at91: add warning about transmission issues for some devices
	i2c: at91: use an id table for SoC dependent parameters

It is especially the last patch I am mostly interested in. The id_table
approach is what I like, while the original id_entry mechanism looks
fishy. I'd was good for reviewing to have the patches split like this;
yet for hitting mainline, I'd prefer to have the driver proper on first
occasion. I already did the squashing in a test-branch and the result
looks good to me.

Nikolaus, Ludovic: Are you fine with this?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120912/f3eb127a/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12  6:42 [PATCH v3 0/8] i2c: at91: cleanup and dt support ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] i2c: at91: use managed resources ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] i2c: at91: add warning about transmission issues for some devices ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] i2c: at91: use an id table for SoC dependent parameters ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ARM: at91: do not configure at91sam9g10 twi pio as open-drain ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] i2c: at91: add dt support to i2c-at91 ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ARM: at91: add clocks for I2C DT entries ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ARM: dts: add twi nodes for atmel SoCs ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ARM: dts: add twi nodes for atmel boards ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-09-12  8:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] i2c: at91: cleanup and dt support Nicolas Ferre
2012-09-12 10:16   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-09-12 10:39     ` Voss, Nikolaus
2012-09-12 11:12     ` ludovic.desroches
2012-09-12 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120912101607.GA2624@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).