linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: ADD descriptor string to CONFIG_DMA_ADDR_64BIT_T
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:19:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120912131918.GD21823@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gzpiZ8Qa8eGprCscmhFa1zW4Bb4ZEVR=e56tXBSE1pGWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:57:26PM +0100, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/12/2012 1:50 AM, R Sricharan wrote:
> >>
> >> Even if CONFIG_DMA_ADDR_64BIT_T is enabled by the defconfig,
> >> the feature is not getting selected.
> >> Adding a string description in the Kconfig resolves this.
> >>
> >> But not sure if this is the right way to fix this.
> >>
> >
> > Shouldn't you be selecting this in your 64-bit dma address capable arch
> > instead?
> >
> Yes. The selection to enable  CONFIG_DMA_ADDR_64BIT_T happens
> in the arch which needs it. Since this option was made as simple bool,
> looks like because of some KCONFIG magic, it was not getting selected.
> Adding some help text does fix the issue and thats is the patch all about.

Are you sure you select this explicitly in Kconfig? It should not depend
on a description.

What I understood from the initial email was that this option was only
added to the defconfig but ignored by the kernel as it's not a user
selectable option (unless you add some text).

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12  5:50 [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: ADD descriptor string to CONFIG_DMA_ADDR_64BIT_T R Sricharan
2012-09-12 12:46 ` Cyril Chemparathy
2012-09-12 12:56   ` Catalin Marinas
2012-09-12 12:57   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-12 13:19     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2012-09-12 13:25       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-12 13:29         ` R, Sricharan
2012-09-12 13:20     ` R, Sricharan
2012-09-12 14:55       ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120912131918.GD21823@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).