From: anton.vorontsov@linaro.org (Anton Vorontsov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 Btemp
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:04:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914020427.GA30729@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201209131437.38666.arnd@arndb.de>
(Thanks for Cc'ing me.)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:37:38PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
> > > If this is true, I don't understand what makes the 'supplied-to'
> > > properties you list in the device tree binding board specific. Are
> > > they not always done the same way? If so, you could just leave them
> > > out.
> > Precisely 'supplied-to' is not board specific, it was maintained as
> > platform_data which i migrated to dt-node. It is meant to establish
> > dependency across bm drivers based on power_supply property and
> > runtime battery attributes.
> > Basically, 'supplied-to' provides a way of exporting change in
> > power_supply_property and runtime batter characteristics so that other
> > bm devs shall make use or refer the updated values.
> > Ref: external_power_changed(...) call back api.
> > Note: all the bm drivers handles subset of power_supply property and
> > battery attributes,
> > ref: include/linux/power_supply.h and get_property(...) call back
> > api across bm drivers.
>
> Ok, so you want to just remove the property from the device tree,
> or do you want to establish a different method to specify these
> connections?
Power supply subsystem's supplied_to describes not just how driver
should notify other devices, supplied_to is more generic stuff, in terms
that it describes power supply hierarchy. It's like a directed graph,
e.g.:
<AC power> supplied_to <main battery> and <backup battery>
<USB power> supplied_to <main battery> and <backup battery>
<main battery> supplied_to <system>
<backup battery> supplied_to <system>
<cmos battery> supplied_to <southbridge pci device>
<mice battery> supplied_to <mice wireless hid>
How things interact in linux are just implementations details.
So, device tree is surely a perfect place to describe these things.
Although, in current bindings I see this:
+ ab8500-fg {
+ /* Other enery management module */
+ supplied_to = "ab8500_chargalg", "ab8500_usb";
+ num_supplicants = <2>;
+ };
Instead of addressing supplicants by name, it's better to address
via phandles. And, of course, num_supplicants is not needed, it can
be derived.
[...]
> > > possible batteries and require a property such as
> > >
> > > st-ericsson,battery-type: A string identifier for the type of battery,
> > > which impacts how an operating system interpret
> > > the sensor readings. Possible values include:
> > > * "none" -- no battery connected
> > > * "li-ion-9100" -- Type 9100 Li-ION battery
> > > * <add any others that apply here>
> > Can do this, not precisely as "st-ericsson,battery-type", it will be as
> > battery-type = [unknown|NiMH|LION|...|]], reason being
> > allowable battery type is based on technology, as you can see the
> > possible types as:
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_UNKNOWN = 0,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_NiMH,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_LION,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_LIPO,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_LiFe,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_NiCd,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY_LiMn
> > Ref: include/linux/power_supply.h
> > Note: doing this will impact my of_probe(...), may slightly bloat the
> > code.
>
> Ok.
>
> If you want to make the battery type a generic property, it's probably
> best to start a separate binding document for this in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power-supply/common.txt
> and document a string for each of these.
Fully agree. We need to document generic DT bindings for power supplies.
Thanks,
Anton.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 11:21 mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 Btemp Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-10 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-10 15:06 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-11 8:45 ` Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-11 11:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-12 14:33 ` Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-12 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-13 13:31 ` Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-13 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-14 2:04 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-09-14 8:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-14 9:34 ` Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-14 10:17 ` Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-15 11:01 ` mfd: " Francesco Lavra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120914020427.GA30729@lizard \
--to=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).