From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/19] i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:02:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914090228.GH3374@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914084141.GA2630@pengutronix.de>
> > > First, I'd like to have this patch squashed with "i2c: nomadik: Add
> > > Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver". I wanted to do this on
> > > my own, but the patches do not apply to 3.6-rc5 (with or without
> > > regulator removal patch from Linus)?
> >
> > I'm really not keen on squashing all my patches together. They are
> > clearly have very different purposes. If you think they are closely
> > related, then pull them in sequentially, but please don't squash
> > all my work into a single patch for no other reason than convenience.
>
> I can't follow this reasoning. I never asked you to squash all patches,
> only those two needed to get proper device tree support. Why would you
> want to let the device being detected via DT and not scan the child
> nodes immediately?
Ah, sorry. That's my fault for rushing though my ridiculously bloated post-
vacation inbox. I *stupidly* thought you wanted me to squash two different
patches, rather than these two. As such I unreservedly retract my previous
statement. Yes, please squash.
> > > I can also take the I2C related changes to the devicetrees via my tree.
> > > This is not uncommon. Some people prefer to do this via their soc-trees,
> > > though. I don't care much since this is not really a hard dependency
> > > causing build failures or merge conflicts, but just needs a little extra
> > > time until the patches are all there...
> >
> > It would be better for all the Device Tree changes go in as a single
> > patch-set. Again, I don't care where they go, so long as they go in
> > together. arm-soc seems like the most generic place for them to be
> > pulled into though.
>
> This reasoning I can follow, but how should I know you aimed for that? I
> only saw a patch [3/3] in one series making the driver probable via DT
> and a patch [12/19] in another series to scan the child nodes. That's
> all the infos I got. Some more context would have been helpful. Is there
> a branch somewhere with all the things collected?
There will be. I'm currently just Ack collecting.
In fact wait ...
<3 mins pass>
Now there is:
git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 11:14 [PATCH 00/19] First HREF Device Tree enablement patch-set Lee Jones
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 01/19] ARM: ux500: Add skeleton Device Tree for the HREF reference board Lee Jones
2012-09-10 8:47 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 9:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14 14:01 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 02/19] ARM: ux500: Add UART support to the HREF Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-10 8:49 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 03/19] ARM: ux500: Pass SDI DMA information though AUX_DATA to MMCI Lee Jones
2012-09-10 8:50 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 04/19] ARM: ux500: Add SDI (MMC) support to the HREF Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-07 12:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-07 12:39 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-10 9:51 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 05/19] ARM: ux500: Stop registering HREF's SDI devices from platform data Lee Jones
2012-09-07 12:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 06/19] ARM: ux500: Add nodes for the MSP into the HREF Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-10 9:53 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 9:23 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14 14:00 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 07/19] ARM: ux500: Add all encompassing sound node to " Lee Jones
2012-09-10 9:56 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 08/19] ARM: ux500: Stop registering Audio devices for HREF when DT is enabled Lee Jones
2012-09-10 9:57 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 09/19] ARM: ux500: Enable SSP (SPI) for HREF when booting Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-10 11:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 9:18 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-17 17:03 ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-18 12:08 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-18 12:13 ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 10/19] ARM: ux500: Remove redundant #gpio-cell properties from HREF and Snowball DT Lee Jones
2012-09-10 11:12 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14 13:58 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 11/19] ARM: ux500: Add all known I2C sub-device nodes to the HREF DT Lee Jones
2012-09-10 11:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 8:47 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-20 6:51 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-18 15:49 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 12/19] i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-10 11:42 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-12 10:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-14 8:27 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14 8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-14 9:02 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-09-14 9:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-14 10:15 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-14 11:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-19 20:12 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-06 11:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-14 8:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 13/19] ARM: ux500: Stop registering I2C sub-devices for HREF when DT is enabled Lee Jones
2012-09-10 12:56 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 14/19] ARM: ux500: Apply tc3589x's GPIO/IRQ properties to HREF's DT Lee Jones
2012-09-10 12:58 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 8:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 15/19] mfd: Don't convert just one IRQ using irqdomain if a range is provided Lee Jones
2012-09-07 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-07 12:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 13:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-07 13:43 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-17 13:45 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-17 14:11 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-21 22:20 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 16/19] mfd: Provide the tc3589x with its own IRQ domain Lee Jones
2012-09-10 13:05 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-16 23:45 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 17/19] mfd: Enable the tc3589x for Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-10 13:08 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-16 23:45 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 18/19] gpio: Provide the tc3589x GPIO expander driver with an IRQ domain Lee Jones
2012-09-10 13:10 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-12 13:04 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-14 8:14 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-12 21:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 11:14 ` [PATCH 19/19] gpio: Enable the tc3298x GPIO expander driver for Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-09-10 13:20 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-12 21:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 12:41 ` [PATCH 00/19] First HREF Device Tree enablement patch-set Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-07 13:01 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-07 13:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-07 14:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-10 8:41 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-10 10:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-10 11:29 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-10 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120914090228.GH3374@gmail.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).