From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:47:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920124709.GN17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120920115213.GF2450@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:52:15PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:41:50AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so
> > I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull
> > request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable
> > yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here?
> We need the patch to have all imx drivers mach/* inclusion free,
> so that we can enable multi-platform support for imx, which is the
> whole point of the series.
That doesn't answer the question. What is the dependency - what is it
about this patch that something else depends on? Your cover letters
just say you'd like to do this but don't mention dependencies at all and
when I asked the question last night you said the same thing. I've not
seen the rest of the series...
> If your for-3.7 is not stable anyway, I guess the easiest the way
It probably *is* stable but I'm not enthused about people pulling
unsigned tags. I might rebase, though - I'm going to finalise the tree
in the next few days.
> to do it might be you drop the patch "ASoC: mx27vis: retrieve gpio
> numbers from platform_data" from your tree and I have it be part of
> the series to go via arm-soc tree as a whole. (This is the original
> plan that I mentioned in v1 cover letter)
You just mentioned it as a preference (you said it's something you'd
like to do), please if you're doing this sort of cross tree thing be
explicit about what the inter-tree relationships are. If things need to
go in via the same tree say so explicitly (and ideally say way this is).
The main reason I applied it straight away was that Javier mentioned
that it was a bug fix and it's near the merge window and these random
ARM cleanup serieses never seem to go in quickly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 6:45 [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] ARM: imx: include board headers in the same folder Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] ARM: imx: move iomux drivers and headers into mach-imx Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] ARM: imx: remove unnecessary inclusion from device-imx*.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] ARM: imx: move platform device code into mach-imx Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] ARM: imx: merge plat-mxc " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] ARM: imx: include common.h rather than mach/common.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] ARM: imx: ARM: imx: include cpuidle.h rather than mach/cpuidle.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] ARM: imx: include iim.h rather than mach/iim.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] ARM: imx: include iram.h rather than mach/iram.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] ARM: imx: include ulpi.h rather than mach/ulpi.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] media: mx1_camera: remove the driver Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 12:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-09-20 14:47 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] ARM: imx: remove mach/dma-mx1-mx2.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] dma: ipu: rename mach/ipu.h to include/linux/dma/ipu-dma.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] dma: imx-sdma: remove unneeded mach/hardware.h inclusion Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] ASoC: imx-ssi: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] usb: ehci-mxc: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] video: mx3fb: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] watchdog: imx2_wdt: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] i2c: imx: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] mtd: mxc_nand: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] rtc: mxc_rtc: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] dma: imx-dma: use devm_kzalloc and devm_request_irq Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] dma: imx-dma: retrieve MEM and IRQ from resources Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] dma: imx-dma: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] media: mx2_camera: remove dead code in mx2_camera_add_device Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] media: mx2_camera: use managed functions to clean up code Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id Shawn Guo
2012-09-27 19:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-10-06 8:26 ` Shawn Guo
2012-10-06 14:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] mmc: mxcmmc: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] video: imxfb: " Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] ARM: imx: move debug macros to include/debug Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] ARM: imx: include hardware.h rather than mach/hardware.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] ARM: imx: remove header file mach/irqs.h Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] ARM: imx: call mxc_device_init() in soc specific function Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] ARM: imx: enable multi-platform build Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-20 11:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-20 11:52 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 12:47 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-09-20 13:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 14:53 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-20 15:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-21 8:01 ` [alsa-devel] " Shawn Guo
2012-09-21 8:26 ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-21 16:46 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-21 16:53 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-22 7:41 ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-22 8:09 ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-22 9:34 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-22 15:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120920124709.GN17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).