From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:32:15 +0100
Subject: [RFT/PATCH] serial: omap: prevent resume if device is not
 suspended.
In-Reply-To: <20120925111243.GR9137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
References: <20120925083029.GG31374@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120925083118.GI9137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <20120925091228.GI31374@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120925091112.GK9137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <20120925092118.GJ31374@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120925094815.GL9137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <20120925102958.GL31374@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120925103652.GN9137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <20120925110703.GN31374@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120925111243.GR9137@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Message-ID: <20120925113215.GP31374@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:12:43PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> I don't see any aggressive attitude towards what you suggested,
> actually. Mailing list archives are available to check, but the one
> cursing around was always yourself and THAT deserves an apology.

Total rubbish.  No apology, because I wasn't cursing you.  Whatever,
I'm not going to re-explain the email thread.

What I said was that your raising of beagleboard breakage (twice) was
idiotic to a request for investigation.  That's a statement I _still_
fully agree with, and I'll say it again if I have to.

Trying to shut down investigation because investigation may break
something _is_ idiotic - especially if the investigation reveals
potential reasons why that breakage would occur.  Further investigation
is precisely how we arrive at better solutions.