From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cavokz@gmail.com (Domenico Andreoli) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:26:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH V6] ARM: bcm2835: add stub clock driver In-Reply-To: <5059EF86.8060902@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1348026973-18887-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <5059EF86.8060902@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120926212639.GA20182@glitch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:15:02AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/19/2012 02:54 AM, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Sep 19, 2012 5:57 AM, "Stephen Warren" > > wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/clk-bcm2835.c > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..ad65f0e > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-bcm2835.c > >> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ > >> +/* > >> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Broadcom > >> + * > >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > >> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > >> + * (at your option) any later version. > >> + * > >> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > >> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > >> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > >> + * GNU General Public License for more details. > >> + * > >> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > >> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software > >> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA > > 02111-1307 USA > >> + */ > > > > why the copyright is of Broadcom? these files are written from scratch > > or anyway being reworked quite a bit, right? > > The original code in Simon's branch has this (c) message so I maintained > it. I honestly don't know whether Simon wrote this patch from scratch or > derived it from Broadcom code. > > Given the rework I did, I suppose I should have added my (c) on this > patchset too though; I can fix that up locally before sending the pull > request unless you have objections. No objections for sure. Thanks. Domenico