From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au (David Gibson) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:53:42 +1000 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix segfault in DTC In-Reply-To: <5065F4FD.4010807@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1348526885-2113-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <1348595889-6495-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <1348595889-6495-2-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <20120925233054.GL9800@truffula.fritz.box> <50624393.30607@broadcom.com> <20120926003508.GB31993@truffula.fritz.box> <50632F78.4030709@broadcom.com> <5065D9C7.40906@wwwdotorg.org> <5065F4FD.4010807@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120929235342.GA23078@truffula.fritz.box> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:05:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/28/2012 12:53 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > >>> > >>> Yeah, seems like the kernel DTC is quite old. > >> > >> FYI, I'm working on a patch to the kernel to bring in the latest dtc. > > > > Awesome. Thank you. > > > >> I've run a regression test vs. the old dtc in the kernel ... > > > > Which is the icky step. Again, thank you. > > > >> ... and found that > >> some of the PowerPC .dts files don't compile with the new dtc (but did > >> with the old), all due to non-existent labels/paths being referenced. > >> I'll try and track down whether this is a regression in dtc, or simply > >> buggy .dts files that weren't noticed before. > > > > I think you should just smack the PowerPC guys. :-) > > For the record in this thread, it was a regression I introduced into dtc > - the patch I just sent was for this. I would be nice to add a testcase for this regression into dtc. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson