From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: cache-l2x0 DT for v3.7
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:01:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120930080136.GE6933@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120930035503.GB477@quad.lixom.net>
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 08:55:03PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:50:12PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Depends:
> > - Based on arm-soc/late/kirkwood
> > - Patches going through rmk's patch tracker:
> > - arm: cache-l2x0: make outer_cache_fns a field of l2x0_of_data
> > - arm: cache-l2x0: add an optional register to save/restore
> > - arm: cache-l2x0: add support for Aurora L2 cache ctrl
> >
> > - feature-use dependency only. No build breakage or failed boot
> > should occur. Until patches from rmk's tracker land, driver
> > won't know about compatible property, so it's like the driver
> > isn't there.
> >
> > Adds:
> > - cache-l2x0 DT entry for Marvell Armada (mvebu) SoCs
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> I'd prefer to hold off on this until we know that Russell is happy with
> the l2x0 changes, just in case this part of the series might need revising
> (i.e. bindings changes). Please resend when he has picked them up!
Well, there's no patches ever existing in the patch tracker with a
summary line as you list above - here are the last three containing
"l2x0":
7398/1? l2x0: only write to debug 3.4-rc3? 20 Apr Applied?
registers on PL310 2012?
7429/1? cache-l2x0: add a const qualifier 3.4? 22 Jun Discarded?
2012?
7507/1? cache-l2x0.c: save the final aux 3.6-rc4? 03 Sep Applied?
ctrl value for resuming 2012?
and it's probably now too late as I'm not going to be able to apply
any patches for the rest of the week, and as the -rc's have been
released over the weekend, we could see -final today.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-30 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 1:50 [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: cache-l2x0 DT for v3.7 Jason Cooper
2012-09-30 3:55 ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-30 8:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-10-01 0:06 ` Jason Cooper
2012-10-01 10:23 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-10-01 0:02 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120930080136.GE6933@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).