From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:01:36 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: cache-l2x0 DT for v3.7 In-Reply-To: <20120930035503.GB477@quad.lixom.net> References: <20120930015012.GB17765@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20120930035503.GB477@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <20120930080136.GE6933@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 08:55:03PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:50:12PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Depends: > > - Based on arm-soc/late/kirkwood > > - Patches going through rmk's patch tracker: > > - arm: cache-l2x0: make outer_cache_fns a field of l2x0_of_data > > - arm: cache-l2x0: add an optional register to save/restore > > - arm: cache-l2x0: add support for Aurora L2 cache ctrl > > > > - feature-use dependency only. No build breakage or failed boot > > should occur. Until patches from rmk's tracker land, driver > > won't know about compatible property, so it's like the driver > > isn't there. > > > > Adds: > > - cache-l2x0 DT entry for Marvell Armada (mvebu) SoCs > > Hi Jason, > > I'd prefer to hold off on this until we know that Russell is happy with > the l2x0 changes, just in case this part of the series might need revising > (i.e. bindings changes). Please resend when he has picked them up! Well, there's no patches ever existing in the patch tracker with a summary line as you list above - here are the last three containing "l2x0": 7398/1? l2x0: only write to debug 3.4-rc3? 20 Apr Applied? registers on PL310 2012? 7429/1? cache-l2x0: add a const qualifier 3.4? 22 Jun Discarded? 2012? 7507/1? cache-l2x0.c: save the final aux 3.6-rc4? 03 Sep Applied? ctrl value for resuming 2012? and it's probably now too late as I'm not going to be able to apply any patches for the rest of the week, and as the -rc's have been released over the weekend, we could see -final today.