From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: MMUless Core: Fix insmod error - module relocation out of range
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:02:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121003100213.GB31930@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121003094801.GG6933@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:48:02AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:25:09AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On 3 October 2012 04:43, Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@st.com> wrote:
> > > From: Neha MAKHIJA <neha.makhija-ext@st.com>
> > >
> > > ARM supports 32Mb jump. Hence branch instruction has a limited range.
> > >
> > > For MMU systems, the module area is located just before the kernel memory
> > > because this allows function calls to be linked directly without any indirect
> > > branches.
> > >
> > > In case of MMU-less system, Module area is given whole of the DDR address
> > > space. Since, module_alloc() calls vmalloc(), the module area goes outside the
> > > allowed jump range. Due to this insmod will not be able to load the modules
> > > giving out of range relocation errors.
> > >
> > > Solution - Add the mlong-calls flags while compiling the modules. This tells
> > > the compiler to perform function calls by first loading the address of the
> > > function and then performing a subroutine function call on this register.
> >
> > Do we need the module loader to handle additional relocations or they
> > are all already handled?
>
> I have explained this extensively when the 2.6 module loader came into
> being. It's not about additional relocations, it's about the addressible
> range of the 'b' instruction.
But doesn't -mlong-calls generate the function calls by first loading
the address in a register?
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 3:43 [PATCH] ARM: MMUless Core: Fix insmod error - module relocation out of range Pratyush Anand
2012-10-03 9:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-03 9:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-03 10:02 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121003100213.GB31930@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox