From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mchehab@redhat.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 11:39:05 -0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 27/34] media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id In-Reply-To: <20121006082638.GB20231@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1348123547-31082-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1348123547-31082-28-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120927160321.56420910@redhat.com> <20121006082638.GB20231@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20121006113905.3facece0@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Em Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:26:40 +0800 Shawn Guo escreveu: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:03:21PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > It seems that it depends on some stuff that got merged via the arm tree. > > > > Not sure what would the better way to handle that, as applying it via -arm > > will likely generate conflicts when merging from both trees upstream. > > > > If this change is not urgent, maybe it would be better to apply it after > > the end of the merge window, via either one of the trees. > > > That's the original plan, having it merged via arm-soc tree at the end > of 3.7 merge window. But I was told by arm-soc folks that we already > have enough conflicts to sort out for this window, and we do not want > any more. And we have to postpone it to 3.8. > > I will publish a topic branch for this series after 3.7-rc1 comes out. Ok. Btw, as expected, the patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore, due to the file renames. Waiting for 3.7-rc1 seems to be the right thing to do here. -- Regards, Mauro