From: m.olbrich@pengutronix.de (Michael Olbrich)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Problem with 64-bit registers on i.MX53
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:08:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121008160841.GM19651@pengutronix.de> (raw)
Hi,
I have a problem that looks like that 64-bit registers (I think) are not
saved/restored correctly on a context switch. I've reduced it to the
following test case:
- Latest Linux mainline kernel (v3.6-8559-ge9eca4d)
v3.5 is also affected
- imx_v6_v7_defconfig
- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-evk.dts
The following test program is compiled with "-mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon
-O2".
------------------------>8--------------------------------
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <assert.h>
volatile int x = 2;
volatile int64_t y = 2;
int main() {
volatile int a = 0;
volatile int64_t b = 0;
while (1) {
a = (a + x) % (1 << 30);
b = (b + y) % (1 << 30);
assert(a == b);
}
}
------------------------>8--------------------------------
The ".. (b + y) .." should result in "vadd.i64 d19, d18, d16" or
something like that.
If I start the program twice in parallel, then on aborts immediately with
the assert().
When looking at it with the debugger, it seems as if the calculation
"b = (b + y) % (1 << 30)" produces an incorrect value.
A single instance of the program runs longer, but hits the assert()
eventually. So running multiple processes that use 64-bit registers
triggers the problem really fast. This is why I think the problem has
something to do with context switches.
Not using 64-bit registers (-msoft-float) makes the problem go away.
So it's definitely related to 64-bit registers.
If I disable all MX31/MX35 boards (and therefore all ARMv6 support), then
it works as expected.
Any ideas what goes wrong here?
Regards,
Michael Olbrich
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 16:08 Michael Olbrich [this message]
2012-10-08 17:01 ` Problem with 64-bit registers on i.MX53 Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 17:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 17:50 ` Dave Martin
2012-10-08 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 18:04 ` Dave Martin
2012-10-09 9:02 ` Michael Olbrich
2012-10-09 8:52 ` Michael Olbrich
2012-10-09 9:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-10-09 14:05 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121008160841.GM19651@pengutronix.de \
--to=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).