From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:06:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Add UART support to the u9540 Device Tree In-Reply-To: <20121011092222.GW9707@gmail.com> References: <1349882335-6786-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1349882335-6786-5-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20121010190325.GT12801@game.jcrosoft.org> <20121011072927.GR9707@gmail.com> <20121011085002.GV12801@game.jcrosoft.org> <20121011092222.GW9707@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20121011180612.GY12801@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10:22 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 08:29 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > > > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540. > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- > > > > dts? it's dtsi > > > > > > No it's not. > > so the name of the file is wrong s u9540 is a SoC name > > The board could actually be called either ccu9540, or just > u9540. I picked one and went with it. The full name is the > u9540 development board. so use ccu9540 as u9540 is the soc name so if we use u9540 as compatible we expect to mach the soc and not a board Best Regards, J.