From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: UART: fix console UART mismatched runtime PM status
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:28:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121017082818.GZ28061@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350344998-16328-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:49:58PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>
> The runtime PM framework assumes that the hardware state of devices
> when initialized is disabled. For all omap_devices, we idle/disable
> device by default. However, the console uart uses a "no idle" option
> during omap_device init in order to allow earlyprintk usage to work
> seamlessly during boot.
>
> Because the hardware is left partially enabled after init (whatever
> the bootloader settings were), the omap_device should later be fully
> initialized (including mux) and the runtime PM framework should be
> told that the device is active, and not disabled so that the hardware
> state is in sync with runtime PM state.
>
> To fix, after the device has been created/registered, call
> omap_device_enable() to finialize init and use pm_runtime_set_active()
> to tell the runtime PM core the device is enabled.
I still believe you're better off with the approach I gave. Why?
Because every driver you have contains virtually the same sequence of
runtime PM "initialization" which is to runtime PM enable the device
and then do a get on it.
Why not do that in bus code if all your drivers are doing the same
thing, and kill off a bunch of code in the drivers?
It's fairly easy to do with the BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER / BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER
bus level notifies, and you've already hooked the notifier list for
these callbacks in omap_device.c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-15 23:49 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: UART: fix console UART mismatched runtime PM status Kevin Hilman
2012-10-16 0:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-16 10:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-16 21:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-17 1:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-17 2:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-17 8:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121017082818.GZ28061@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).