From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:41:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "spi/pl022: enable runtime PM" In-Reply-To: <20121023111656.GT21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1349452272-4002-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1349452272-4002-2-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20121023111019.GV4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20121023111656.GT21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20121023114130.GW4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:16:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I *really* should not need to remind you to: > > - Not top post > > - Send patches in a form which can be applied if you want them applying > How about actually applying the damned patch from the two-part patch set, > rather than only the first, both of which has been around for almost a > month now, and fixes what should never have gone into mainline in the > first place? Well, the reason for the second point is that I don't have a copy of the patch any more, I need a copy of it before I can do anything. Half the reason these contentless top posts are annoying is that even if there's something to do it's not actionable. I have to say I had been under the impression that Linus' series that I applied the other day dealt with all the outstanding stuff here; the issues with this have been the awful changelogs and the overalapping sets of patches. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: