From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] pinctrl: mvebu: reset pins to an UNKNOWN state on startup
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:21:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024222139.40fb2ad5@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024201545.GA21046@lunn.ch>
Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:15:45 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:18:01PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Note: this patch is a *RFC*, it is not intended for merging, only to
> > get a discussion started. The code is horrible, makes terrible
> > assumptions and so on.
> >
> > On many platforms, most of the pinmux initialization is done in the
> > bootloader, and therefore persists when we boot the Linux kernel. This
> > prevents us from making sure that the pinmux configuration in the
> > board device trees is correct.
>
> You can get a lot of information from /debug. eg,
> # cat /debug/pinctrl/f1010000.pinctrl/pinconf-groups
Yes, I was using that one...
> # cat /debug/pinctrl/f1010000.pinctrl/pinmux-pins
> Pinmux settings per pin
> Format: pin (name): mux_owner gpio_owner hog?
... but not that one.
> If you compare the two, you can see that pin 6 has probably been set by
> uboot, but not by DT.
Indeed, by correlating the two files, you can get a good view of which
pins are configured even though no driver has claimed them. I don't
think it's as clear as having a non-functional device due to the pin
not being muxed at all, but if it is thought as being sufficient, then
fair enough.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-24 19:18 [PATCH] [RFC] pinctrl: mvebu: reset pins to an UNKNOWN state on startup Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 19:38 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-10-24 19:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 20:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-10-24 20:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-10-25 6:51 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-25 6:46 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-25 10:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-25 15:47 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024222139.40fb2ad5@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).