linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] pinctrl: mvebu: reset pins to an UNKNOWN state on startup
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:21:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024222139.40fb2ad5@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024201545.GA21046@lunn.ch>

Dear Andrew Lunn,

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:15:45 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:18:01PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Note: this patch is a *RFC*, it is not intended for merging, only to
> > get a discussion started. The code is horrible, makes terrible
> > assumptions and so on.
> > 
> > On many platforms, most of the pinmux initialization is done in the
> > bootloader, and therefore persists when we boot the Linux kernel. This
> > prevents us from making sure that the pinmux configuration in the
> > board device trees is correct.
> 
> You can get a lot of information from /debug. eg,
> # cat /debug/pinctrl/f1010000.pinctrl/pinconf-groups 

Yes, I was using that one...


> # cat /debug/pinctrl/f1010000.pinctrl/pinmux-pins 
> Pinmux settings per pin
> Format: pin (name): mux_owner gpio_owner hog?

... but not that one.

> If you compare the two, you can see that pin 6 has probably been set by
> uboot, but not by DT.

Indeed, by correlating the two files, you can get a good view of which
pins are configured even though no driver has claimed them. I don't
think it's as clear as having a non-functional device due to the pin
not being muxed at all, but if it is thought as being sufficient, then
fair enough.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 19:18 [PATCH] [RFC] pinctrl: mvebu: reset pins to an UNKNOWN state on startup Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 19:38 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2012-10-24 19:51   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-24 20:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-10-24 20:21   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-10-25  6:51     ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-25  6:46 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-25 10:27   ` Mark Brown
2012-10-25 15:47 ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121024222139.40fb2ad5@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).