From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable PMUs for exynos4
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:41:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121025144125.GH11267@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005801cdb251$e52f7480$af8e5d80$@samsung.com>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:41:46AM +0100, Chanho Park wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Chanho Park
> > <chanho61.park@samsung.com> wrote:
> > > This patch defines irq numbers of ARM performance monitoring unit for
> > exynos4.
> > > Firs of all, we need to fix IRQ_PMU correctly and to split pmu
> > > initialization of exynos from plat-samsung for easily defining it.
> > >
> > > The number of CPU cores and PMU irq numbers are vary according to soc
> > types.
> > > So, we need to identify each soc type using soc_is_xxx function and to
> > > define the pmu irqs dynamically. For example, the exynos4412 has 4 cpu
> > cores and pmus.
> >
> > I wonder if it's worth doing this complexity on the non-DT case for exynos4?
> >
> > I wish there was more focus on the Samsung platforms for getting the DT
> > support up to par with non-DT so you can avoid having to add new platform
> > devices like these in the first place.
>
> The DT support of exynos4 is under development.
It seems to have been under development for a while now and changes like
this don't exactly encourage people to chip-in with that effort. Would it
not be better to spend time helping to complete the DT support instead of
retro-fitting static platform devices into the code?
> And many of exynos4 developers still use non-dt boot-up method.
That's not surprising if the DT code is still under development -- it's a
chicken-and-egg problem.
> By this time arm-pmu of exynos did not work. IMO we should fix and support it
> for non-dt users.
I agree that we definitely want to support the PMU on Exynos4, but I'm
tempted to postpone adding that code until DT support is available.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-24 5:34 [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support to enable ARM PMU for EXYNOS Chanho Park
2012-10-24 5:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add set_irq_affinity function for combiner_irq Chanho Park
2012-10-24 5:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Correct combined IRQs for exynos4 Chanho Park
2012-10-24 5:34 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable PMUs " Chanho Park
2012-10-24 17:14 ` Olof Johansson
2012-10-25 1:41 ` Chanho Park
2012-10-25 14:41 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-10-26 4:05 ` Chanho Park
2012-10-26 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-24 5:34 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add arm-pmu DT binding for exynos5250 Chanho Park
2012-10-24 5:34 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add arm-pmu DT binding for exynos421x Chanho Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121025144125.GH11267@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).