From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:57:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] at91sam9m10g45-ek: rename leds to match board
In-Reply-To: <20121029212826.GA6203@piout.net>
References: <1351279752-6491-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@piout.net>
 <20121027145132.GJ18964@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20121029150038.GA4995@piout.net>
 <20121029161445.GB31214@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20121029212826.GA6203@piout.net>
Message-ID: <20121030125711.GA19021@game.jcrosoft.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 22:28 Mon 29 Oct     , Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:14:45PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
> > No here it's different teh same HW have different revision
> > 
> > m10g45es
> > m10ekes
> > 9g45ekes
> > 
> > the m10ekes is the first one and the leds does match
> > 
> > So I agree we can put a comment in the c or the dts about it but do not change
> > the content as the board support is like this for really long time
> > And I do not want to ebd-up with 2 or 3 dts jsut for lesd naming
> > That I will have to maintain
> > 
> 
> From my discussion with atmel last week, I understood that the only
> publicly available board is the m10g45ek. Support for the other boards
> you mention is actually being dropped and you can't find them on ATMEL's
> website anymore.
> 
> So, I agree you should support only one configuration but at least, let
> it be the one for the current board.
sorry no

we touch dts only if this is a bug this is a comestic change

Best Regards,
J.