From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mchehab@infradead.org (Mauro Carvalho Chehab)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:50:17 -0200
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera
In-Reply-To: <20121031190249.GO1641@pengutronix.de>
References: <1351598606-8485-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
 <20121031095632.536d9362@infradead.org>
 <20121031131652.GM1641@pengutronix.de>
 <CAOMZO5CLxM41LYoLmPbfzSTF85Zk4B5SqHeVbGU4WjEOXw0eyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210311442310.12173@axis700.grange>
 <20121031165303.32921a5c@infradead.org>
 <20121031190249.GO1641@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20121031175017.75640dc1@infradead.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Em Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:02:49 +0100
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> escreveu:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:53:03PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:53:47 +0100 (CET)
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> escreveu:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:

> > I agree with Fabio and Guennadi. There are so many changes happening at arm
> > that merging those two patches there will likely be easier for everybody.
> 
> Ok, then I'll take them. I wasn't aware in arm-soc are sitting patches
> for this driver already.

Thank you!

> > 
> > Otherwise, I'll need to pull from some arm tree that never rebase, with
> > the needed patches, and coordinate with you during the merge window,
> > to be sure that patches will arrive there at the right order, from the
> > right tree.
> 
> Hopefully these kind of cross dependencies become fewer over time. SoC
> code is getting smaller and gets better abstracted from the drivers, so
> chances are good.

Yes, I'm expecting so.

Regards,
Mauro