From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: at91: add a sanity check on i2c message length
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:14:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102111432.GD21313@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5093A8CD.60006@atmel.com>
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:04:45PM +0100, ludovic.desroches wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> Le 11/01/2012 11:29 PM, Wolfram Sang a ?crit :
> >On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:25:58PM +0200, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
> >>From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> >>
> >>If the i2c message length is zero, i2c-at91 will directly return an error
> >>instead of trying to send a zero-length message.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> >
> >What happens if you send a 0 byte message? Some hardware is able to do
> >this and it will be used in SMBUS QUICK which the driver states to
> >support according to at91_twi_func().
>
> Without this I had some data corruption when writing to / reading
> from a serial eeprom (depending on the IP version).
>
> Yes SMBUS quick command is supported but is not managed in the
> driver, we have to tell explicitly the IP that we want to send this
> command.
Ok, so unless you want to implement the support, please update this
patch with a comment that SMBUS_QUICK is a TODO and remove the
SMBUS_QUICK capability.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121102/48709ea9/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-10 14:25 [PATCH] i2c: at91: add a sanity check on i2c message length ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-10-24 14:34 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-11-01 22:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-02 11:04 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-11-02 11:14 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-11-02 16:00 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-11-03 14:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-11-05 6:08 ` Voss, Nikolaus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121102111432.GD21313@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).