From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:21:24 +0100 Subject: [Resend PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add device tree support In-Reply-To: <20121107084932.GE20063@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1352259701-19847-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <20121107084932.GE20063@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <20121107092124.GE12323@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:49:32AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > yes the pinctrl is mainline in -next via pinctrl tree > s code does not work on the DT kernel untill it's done > NACK stand I refuse this touch the at91 dtsi untiol it's done correctly ...and here's another mail (plus a further private mail on the same subject) by the time I managed to reply to the first one, the timestamps say in about ten minutes :/ What I'm seeing here is two of the Atmel maintainers disagreeing about a patch so I've got to pick one view and right now applying the patch looks like it moves us further forwards. Like I say it's not an issue right now and it seems like it should be trivial to fix. Is anything needed here other than adding the pinctrl_get_set_default() call, in which case would it not be less effort all round to just send the patch? If there is more involved then what is needed? Thinking about it a little more I'm actually wondering why whatever pinctrl change made this mandatory didn't go through and update all the drivers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: