[PATCH] arm: zynq: add system level control register manager

[joshc@eso.teric.us (Josh Cartwright)]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:36:12PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> This patch for the Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture adds management of system
> level control register. The code is taken from the Xilinx-internal Linux
> Git tree and cleaned up a bit for mainline integration. Besides others,
> this patch is needed in order to integrate further drivers for Zynq such as
> the Zynq xemacps networking device driver. The patch is aganst the latest
> arm-soc tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
> Cc: Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>
> Cc: John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---

Hey Daniel-

These changes will conflict with my pending clk patchset [1], as I'm
introducing bindings for the SLCR (and its clk interfaces).

It seems like a hefty chunk of the out-of-tree slcr driver is related to
configuring MIO.  I think it would be really nice if this driver was
reworked to use the pinctrl subsystem, and also to provide suitable
device tree bindings.

But, at an even higher level, it would be nice to have a coordinated
plan for getting better Zynq support upstream.  My implicit plan (so
far) has been:

   1. Initial cleanup [get the thing booting] (done)
   2. Figure out clk drivers and bindings (pending)
   3. Figure out MIO pinctrl support and bindings (?)
   4. Adapting out-of-tree peripheral drivers according to 2 & 3 (?)
   5. Add support for SMP (?)

Step 4 has a dependency on 2 and 3, of course, the point being that we
get those into a state where we are happy with them before moving all of
the peripherals over.  I believe step 5 can be done in parallel to the
others.

Arnd-

At a high level, does this sound like a suitable plan of action?  Is
there something else you would like to see from those of us working on
Zynq support?

Thanks,
   Josh

1: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-October/129295.html