From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:24:49 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] clk: ux500: Make mtu driver use apb_pclock
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb3dcDhVD5qkOrRkLJ-RXdmqJ2tAkosoeEB_DwSDSShKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1351080821-18660-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
 <CACRpkdb3dcDhVD5qkOrRkLJ-RXdmqJ2tAkosoeEB_DwSDSShKw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121110012449.16569.82732@nucleus>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Linus Walleij (2012-10-24 10:25:26)
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >
> > The apb clock was before the "common" clock driver for ux500 was merged,
> > handled internally by the clock driver. Now this clock needs to be managed
> > from the mtu driver as a separate clock.
> >
> > This patches is based in 3.7 rc2.
> >
> > It is important the "ARM nomadik patch" is merged together with the
> > clock patch to not break boot. Therefore I suggest this series to go
> > through Mike Turquettes clock tree.
> 
> OK go ahead:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 

I've taken these into clk-next.  While the patches are trivial I'd still
prefer a changelog in the future.  For instance, it would be nice to
explain why removing the block comment is OK in the first patch.

Thanks,
Mike

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij