From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Set bit 22 in the PL310 (cache controller) AuxCtlr register
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:56:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121112105641.GC2346@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121112064547.GN32313@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:45:47AM +0000, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:54:01AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:01:52AM +0000, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
> > > From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > >
> > > Clearing bit 22 in the PL310 Auxiliary Control register (shared
> > > attribute override enable) has the side effect of transforming Normal
> > > Shared Non-cacheable reads into Cacheable no-allocate reads.
> > >
> > > Coherent DMA buffers in Linux always have a Cacheable alias via the
> > > kernel linear mapping and the processor can speculatively load cache
> > > lines into the PL310 controller. With bit 22 cleared, Non-cacheable
> > > reads would unexpectedly hit such cache lines leading to buffer
> > > corruption.
> >
> > Is this still the case with recent kernels? I thought the dma-mapping/cma
> > work avoided the cacheable alias, but perhaps I'm mistaken.
>
> I haven't used CMA but DMA mappings are still normal memory
> non-cacheable.
Ok, so trawling through the list reveals we only have this issue for normal
DMA mappings and not with CMA:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-October/124276.html
I wonder whether we shouldn't just fix that, rather than work around it with
a PL310-specific hack?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1352433712-16364-1-git-send-email-shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[not found] ` <20121109095400.GC2357@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
2012-11-12 6:45 ` [PATCH] Set bit 22 in the PL310 (cache controller) AuxCtlr register Shiraz Hashim
2012-11-12 10:56 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-11-16 10:46 ` Shiraz Hashim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121112105641.GC2346@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).