From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@ti.com (Mike Turquette)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:36:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] clk: ux500: Make mtu driver use apb_pclock
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbGnvywcQWRN9v_=1nkmaqgJK92Zs1S5HSLgppa49bQqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1351080821-18660-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
 <CACRpkdb3dcDhVD5qkOrRkLJ-RXdmqJ2tAkosoeEB_DwSDSShKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121110012449.16569.82732@nucleus>
 <CACRpkdbGnvywcQWRN9v_=1nkmaqgJK92Zs1S5HSLgppa49bQqw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121112183615.17970.20162@nucleus>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Linus Walleij (2012-11-11 10:47:46)
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Linus Walleij (2012-10-24 10:25:26)
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >> >
> >> > The apb clock was before the "common" clock driver for ux500 was merged,
> >> > handled internally by the clock driver. Now this clock needs to be managed
> >> > from the mtu driver as a separate clock.
> >> >
> >> > This patches is based in 3.7 rc2.
> >> >
> >> > It is important the "ARM nomadik patch" is merged together with the
> >> > clock patch to not break boot. Therefore I suggest this series to go
> >> > through Mike Turquettes clock tree.
> >>
> >> OK go ahead:
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >
> > I've taken these into clk-next.  While the patches are trivial I'd still
> > prefer a changelog in the future.  For instance, it would be nice to
> > explain why removing the block comment is OK in the first patch.
> 
> So there may be some collision in linux-next due to this,
> because I've moved the nomadik timer to
> drivers/clksrc and deleted the entire plat-nomadik
> directory.
> 
> I don't know quite how ingenious git is in detecting
> patches on moved files, but if it's causing trouble
> I think it's better if you could ACK them and we
> could reubmit them to ARM SoC on the multiplatform
> branch. i.e. this one:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next/multiplatform
> 

Those patches have my ACK.  Do you want to wait to see if something goes
boom or would you rather I drop them from clk-next preemptively?

Regards,
Mike

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel