linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:35:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115103528.GA21682@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121115101508.GB4398@game.jcrosoft.org>

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

> On 10:04 Thu 15 Nov     , Lee Jones wrote:
> > This patchset supplies a new tool which measures boottime inclusive
> > of bootloader involvement. It seems to be accurate and adds no
> > latency to the booting of the system.
> > 
> > In the first round of testing we booted the kernel 3 times each with
> > boottime enabled and disabled. Actually, when it was disabled, the
> > code was completely removed from the kernel source and the kernel was
> > rebuilt. The difference between present & enabled and completely
> > removed was very little indeed. In fact, averaging out the 3 runs of
> > each, when boottime was enabled the system booted 4ms _faster_, go
> > figure!
> > 
> >              Enabled    Disabled
> >   1st run    2.983093   2.985168
> >   2nd run    2.973266   2.971801
> >   3rd run    2.975402   2.987304
> >   Average    2.977254   2.981424   -0.004171 (-4ms)
> > 
> > 
> > For the next round of testing, we delayed the bootloader for varying
> > amounts of time, then started to remove key components from kernel
> > functionality to see if the boottime system would pick-up on them.
> > 
> >   /* Hang around in the bootloader for a while. */
> >   $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/boottime/summary 
> >     kernel: 42864 msecs
> >     total: 42864 msecs
> >     kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 43% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
> >             cpu1 system: 4% idle: 95% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > 
> >   /* Hang around in the bootloader for a smaller amount of time. */
> >     kernel: 12351 msecs
> >     total: 12351 msecs
> >     kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 43% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
> >             cpu1 system: 2% idle: 97% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> >   
> >   /* Instant boot. (1st run) */
> >     kernel: 7833 msecs
> >     total: 7833 msecs
> >     kernel: cpu0 system: 55% idle: 44% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
> >             cpu1 system: 3% idle: 96% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > 
> >   /* Instant boot. (2nd run) */
> >     kernel: 7817 msecs
> >     total: 7817 msecs
> >     kernel: cpu0 system: 53% idle: 46% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
> >             cpu1 system: 8% idle: 91% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > 
> >   /* Instant boot. (3rd run) */
> >     kernel: 7747 msecs
> >     total: 7747 msecs
> >     kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 42% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
> >             cpu1 system: 2% idle: 97% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> 7/8s? on a u9500 wow it's really slow

No, this is a u8500.

> I do 2/3s here

Really? You installed this quick.

Are you sure you did it correctly?

Don't forget, this times from power-on to userspace.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 10:04 [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] Boottime: A tool for automatic measurement of kernel/bootloader boot time Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:16   ` Kyungmin Park
2012-11-15 11:25     ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:25       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 17:31         ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-20 16:16       ` Lee Jones
2012-11-29 20:35         ` Simon Glass
2012-11-30  8:21           ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 13:52   ` Andrew Murray
2012-11-15 14:37     ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: clksrc-dbx500-prcmu: Add boottime support Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-15 10:35   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-11-15 10:57     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121115103528.GA21682@gmail.com \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).