linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP2+: mux: Fixed gpio mux mode analysis.
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:22:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121117012231.GQ6801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353015597-22703-1-git-send-email-oleg.matcovschi@ti.com>

* oleg.matcovschi at ti.com <oleg.matcovschi@ti.com> [121115 13:42]:
> From: Oleg Matcovschi <oleg.matcovschi@ti.com>
> 
> OMAP_MODE_GPIO() macro verified only OMAP_MUX_MODE4.

Indeed, that needs to be fixed.

> It is not correct for following platforms:
>     2430 - gpio mux mode 3
>     44xx - gpio mux mode 3

Looks like these are set properly to GPIO_IN_MODE3 with
omap_mux_init().

>     54xx - gpio mux mode 6

This will be only using pinctrl-single.c, so we don't
really have to worrry about this one. But I guess we might
as well fix that too while at it if somebody backports omap5
support to some older kernel..
 
> Patch reserves first 3 bits in partition flags for storing gpio mux
> mode in same format as stored in control pad register.
> Modified OMAP_MODE_GPIO() macro handles all possible cases of gpio mux mode.
> Modified omap_mux_init() flags of omap34xx to include OMAP_MUX_GPIO_IN_MODE4.

Why don't you just add int gpio to struct omap_mux_partition?

You're not saving many bytes as at most we have two partitions
so far per SoC.
 
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c
> @@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ int __init omap3_mux_init(struct omap_board_mux *board_subset, int flags)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	return omap_mux_init("core", 0,
> +	return omap_mux_init("core", OMAP_MUX_GPIO_IN_MODE4,
>  			     OMAP3_CONTROL_PADCONF_MUX_PBASE,
>  			     OMAP3_CONTROL_PADCONF_MUX_SIZE,
>  			     omap3_muxmodes, package_subset, board_subset,

The default is GPIO_IN_MODE4, but that seems to be a bad
default choice as only omap3 uses it. So yeah, might as well
initialize that too and not assume any defaults GPIO mode.

Regards,

Tony

      reply	other threads:[~2012-11-17  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 21:39 [PATCH] OMAP2+: mux: Fixed gpio mux mode analysis oleg.matcovschi at ti.com
2012-11-17  1:22 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121117012231.GQ6801@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).