From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:07:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: gic: remove direct use of gic_raise_softirq
In-Reply-To: <20121119115021.GA19788@bnru10>
References: <1351695517-5636-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <1351695517-5636-3-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <20121102124433.GA28213@bnru03> <20121119115021.GA19788@bnru10>
Message-ID: <20121119130718.025b7a2c@skate>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org


On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:20:22 +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> > >         for (i = 0; i < ncores; i++)
> > >                 set_cpu_possible(i, true);
> > > -
> > > -       set_smp_cross_call(gic_raise_softirq);
> > 
> > The ux500 changes looks ok too..
> > 
> > However would you mind re-spinning your series on top of the below patch?
> 
> ping??

I have merged Linus Walleij patches into my irqchip branch with more
changes around the irqchip infrastructure. That said, it will not be
part of the 3.8 release cycle, so we will definitely take care of
re-spinning against the latest ux500 changes.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com