From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:46:38 +0900 Subject: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer In-Reply-To: <50AC31C5.2000504@atmel.com> References: <1353045837-19474-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <1353045837-19474-2-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <20121116061250.GP4387@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50A5DE4E.80206@atmel.com> <20121116064113.GQ4387@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50A5E44D.6040501@atmel.com> <50AB4DEA.3090100@atmel.com> <20121120102712.GF10560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50AC31C5.2000504@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20121121014636.GH4673@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:43:33AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > So, should I keep these two patches [1] and [2] and then send to > pinctrl again, or I need keep it in one patch as [3] which i sent > first. Please send something coherent which can be applied without breaking the branch it is applied to. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: