From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:59:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Dove pinctrl fixes and DT enabling In-Reply-To: References: <1353317996-20841-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <50ACAAF5.2030002@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20121121155903.17f3e9cf@skate> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Linus, On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:42 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > I am referring to patches for a pinctrl/mvebu subfolder. IIRC Thomas > > posted that patch a while ago. Jason is currently sorting things out > > for mvebu pull requests. I guess both can comment on your question, > > as I don't fully understand it. > > So what I mean is that the patches creating pinctrl/mvebu is in the > pinctrl tree, so if patches in the MVEBU tree depend on these, > then it must have pulled in a branch from pinctrl or applied the > same patches in that tree too (which is OK *sometimes*). I know there has been some discussion between Arnd and Jason Cooper (who handles the pull requests for the overall mvebu effort) about this specific topic. I think the outcome of the discussion was that Jason would have to see how much the rest of the mvebu stuff depends on this pinctrl/mvebu change and will see with Arnd how to proceed. But it's certainly better if Jason gives you directly feedback about this. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com