From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:57:47 -0800
Subject: tfp410 and i2c_bus_num
In-Reply-To: <20121119121630.GC15540@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
References: <50A64D35.9050109@ti.com> <20121116151959.GA19411@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <50A65E40.9040208@ti.com> <20121116182146.GC20496@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <50A72390.3050509@ti.com> <20121118113437.GB30462@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <50A9D3DD.6040807@ti.com> <20121119092744.GB4211@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
 <50AA1376.6060801@ti.com> <20121119121630.GC15540@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Message-ID: <20121121175747.GV18567@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [121119 04:25]:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:09:42PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 2012-11-19 11:27, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > 
> > > fair enough... it looks like this is going nowhere, so best we come back
> > > to this later. No reason to block your patch.
> > 
> > Well, the patch is a fix for stable kernels, so even if we had a great
> > idea how to rewrite the dss device handling, it wouldn't affect this
> > patch =).
> 
> ok good ;-)

FYI I'm assuming Tomi will resend the patch as there were some
changes requested early on in the thread.

Tony