[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Peter Ujfalusi]

To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
index 2bf35dc..018abb4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
@@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
 	if (twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
 		pr_warning("%s: unexpected multiple calls\n", __func__);
 
-	ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
-					TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+	ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
+			      TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err;
 
@@ -347,8 +347,8 @@ int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
 	else
 		temp &= ~SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
 
-	ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
-				TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+	ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
+			       TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
 	if (!ret) {
 		twl_sr_enable_autoinit = true;
 		return 0;
-- 
1.8.0

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Peter Ujfalusi]

Hi Tony,

On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
> No functional change.

Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll
need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly.

Thank you,
P?ter

> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
> index 2bf35dc..018abb4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
> @@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
>  	if (twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
>  		pr_warning("%s: unexpected multiple calls\n", __func__);
>  
> -	ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
> -					TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
> +	ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
> +			      TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err;
>  
> @@ -347,8 +347,8 @@ int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
>  	else
>  		temp &= ~SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
>  
> -	ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
> -				TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
> +	ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
> +			       TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		twl_sr_enable_autoinit = true;
>  		return 0;
> 

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Tony Lindgren]

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121115 00:12]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
> > No functional change.
> 
> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll
> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly.

Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Or let me know if I still need to queue it.

Regards,

Tony

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Peter Ujfalusi]

Hi Tony,

On 11/21/2012 10:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121115 00:12]:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
>>> No functional change.
>>
>> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll
>> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly.
> 
> Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> 
> Or let me know if I still need to queue it.

This patch has no dependencies on other patches. It is better to go via
linux-omap.

Thank you,
P?ter

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Tony Lindgren]

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121122 02:28]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 11/21/2012 10:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121115 00:12]:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
> >>> No functional change.
> >>
> >> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll
> >> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly.
> > 
> > Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > 
> > Or let me know if I still need to queue it.
> 
> This patch has no dependencies on other patches. It is better to go via
> linux-omap.

Applying into omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window.

Regards,

Tony

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Peter Ujfalusi]

Hi Tony,

On 12/14/2012 06:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121122 02:28]:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> On 11/21/2012 10:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121115 00:12]:
>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>>>> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
>>>>> No functional change.
>>>>
>>>> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll
>>>> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly.
>>>
>>> Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>>
>>> Or let me know if I still need to queue it.
>>
>> This patch has no dependencies on other patches. It is better to go via
>> linux-omap.
> 
> Applying into omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window.

Today I looked at:
omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-part2
omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-v4
omap-for-v3.8/fixes-non-critical-v2

branches as well linux-next, mainline, but I can not find this patch. I want
to send the second part of the twl-core cleanup series which needs this patch
to be in first.
Can you make sure this is going for 3.8?

Thank you,
P?ter

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER

[Tony Lindgren]

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121221 04:54]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 12/14/2012 06:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121122 02:28]:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> On 11/21/2012 10:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [121115 00:12]:
> >>>> Hi Tony,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>>>> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack.
> >>>>> No functional change.
> >>>>
> >>>> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll
> >>>> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly.
> >>>
> >>> Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >>>
> >>> Or let me know if I still need to queue it.
> >>
> >> This patch has no dependencies on other patches. It is better to go via
> >> linux-omap.
> > 
> > Applying into omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window.
> 
> Today I looked at:
> omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-part2
> omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-v4
> omap-for-v3.8/fixes-non-critical-v2
> 
> branches as well linux-next, mainline, but I can not find this patch. I want
> to send the second part of the twl-core cleanup series which needs this patch
> to be in first.
> Can you make sure this is going for 3.8?

It should be in omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-for-merge-window
that Olof wanted separated from fixes so hopefully it
will get queued once the merge window related issues are
out of the way.

Regards,

Tony