linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mturquette@ti.com (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:24:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121122032407.21126.49680@nucleus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121122031117.GE25470@core.coreip.homeip.net>

Quoting Dmitry Torokhov (2012-11-21 19:11:17)
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:17:50PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:38:59PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:54:24PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Viresh Kumar (2012-11-20 02:13:55)
> > > > > > On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > We'll need to invoke clk_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_*
> > > > > > > conversion so let's uninline the pair.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sorry, but you aren't doing this :(
> > > > > > This routine is already uninlined as it is in clk.c
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Instead you are just moving clk_prepare(), etc calls within
> > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
> > > > > > #else
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I doubt why they have been added under #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > > > > > earlier. Can they exist without CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > @Mike: ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE.  There is no point in
> > > > > selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case.  Commit
> > > > > 93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
> > > > > clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK.  That
> > > > > commit was authored by you.  Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
> > > > > patch was needed?
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > BTW, it looks like the only place where we select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is
> > > > IMX platform and it also selects COMMON_CLK so I think HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > > > can be removed now.
> > > 
> > > You've checked non-ARM architectures too?
> > 
> > Yes:
> > 
> > [dtor at dtor-d630 linux-next]$ grep -r HAVE_CLK_PREPARE .
> > ./arch/arm/Kconfig:     select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > Binary file ./.git/objects/pack/pack-7dad5ee164f601f1327dc78648fa317772c2d872.pack matches
> > ./include/linux/clk.h:#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > ./include/linux/clk.h:#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > ./drivers/clk/Kconfig:config HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > ./drivers/clk/Kconfig:  select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> 
> So how about the one blow?
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry
> 
> CLK: get rid of HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> 
> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> 
> HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is automatically selected by COMMON_CLK and the only
> platform that explicitly selects HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is MXS which has been
> switched to common clk framework, so we can delete this option now.
> 
> As part of this change we move declarations of clk_prepare() and
> clk_unprepare() under HAVE_CLK and provide stubs if this option is not
> enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Looks right to me.  Just need to remove the select from IMX as well.

Regards,
Mike

> ---
>  drivers/clk/Kconfig |    4 ---
>  include/linux/clk.h |   68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> index bace9e9..639ee9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> @@ -3,15 +3,11 @@ config CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>         bool
>         select HAVE_CLK
>  
> -config HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> -       bool
> -
>  config HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
>         bool
>  
>  config COMMON_CLK
>         bool
> -       select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
>         select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>         ---help---
>           The common clock framework is a single definition of struct
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk.h b/include/linux/clk.h
> index b3ac22d..f8204c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk.h
> @@ -84,42 +84,6 @@ int clk_notifier_unregister(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb);
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -/**
> - * clk_prepare - prepare a clock source
> - * @clk: clock source
> - *
> - * This prepares the clock source for use.
> - *
> - * Must not be called from within atomic context.
> - */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> -int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk);
> -#else
> -static inline int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> -       might_sleep();
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -/**
> - * clk_unprepare - undo preparation of a clock source
> - * @clk: clock source
> - *
> - * This undoes a previously prepared clock.  The caller must balance
> - * the number of prepare and unprepare calls.
> - *
> - * Must not be called from within atomic context.
> - */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> -void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk);
> -#else
> -static inline void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
> -{
> -       might_sleep();
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
>  /**
>   * clk_get - lookup and obtain a reference to a clock producer.
> @@ -159,6 +123,27 @@ struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id);
>  struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id);
>  
>  /**
> + * clk_prepare - prepare a clock source
> + * @clk: clock source
> + *
> + * This prepares the clock source for use.
> + *
> + * Must not be called from within atomic context.
> + */
> +int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk);
> +
> +/**
> + * clk_unprepare - undo preparation of a clock source
> + * @clk: clock source
> + *
> + * This undoes a previously prepared clock.  The caller must balance
> + * the number of prepare and unprepare calls.
> + *
> + * Must not be called from within atomic context.
> + */
> +void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk);
> +
> +/**
>   * clk_enable - inform the system when the clock source should be running.
>   * @clk: clock source
>   *
> @@ -292,6 +277,17 @@ static inline void clk_put(struct clk *clk) {}
>  
>  static inline void devm_clk_put(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk) {}
>  
> +static inline int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +       might_sleep();
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +       might_sleep();
> +}
> +
>  static inline int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>  {
>         return 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-22  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-20  9:22 [RFC/PATCH 0/3] CLK: add more devm_* APIs Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-20  9:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare() Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-20  9:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-20  9:40     ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-20  9:57     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-20 10:13   ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-21 20:43     ` Mike Turquette
2012-11-21 20:54       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-21 22:38         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22  2:17           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-22  3:11             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-22  3:24               ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2012-11-22  9:31                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22  3:26               ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-22  9:30             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22 10:03               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22 10:08               ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-23  7:19               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-23  7:27                 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-23  8:08                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-23  8:43                     ` Shawn Guo
2012-11-22  3:34       ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-22  4:05         ` Mike Turquette
2012-11-20  9:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-20  9:35   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-20 10:18   ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-16 11:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-16 11:41     ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-16 11:57     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-16 12:20       ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-16 12:40         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-16 13:05           ` Viresh Kumar
2012-12-16 13:09             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-17  5:42             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-04-08 10:19               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-01-13 14:06                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2012-11-20  9:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] CLK: add more managed APIs Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-20 10:05   ` Viresh Kumar
2012-11-20  9:34 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] CLK: add more devm_* APIs Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-20  9:53   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-22  5:34 ` [PATCH v2 " Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-22  5:34   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] CLK: get rid of HAVE_CLK_PREPARE Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-22  6:12     ` Shawn Guo
2012-11-22  9:54     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22  5:34   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() Dmitry Torokhov
2012-11-22  5:34   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] CLK: add more managed APIs Dmitry Torokhov
2017-01-02 18:09     ` [v2,3/3] " Guenter Roeck
2012-11-22  5:47   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] CLK: add more devm_* APIs Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121122032407.21126.49680@nucleus \
    --to=mturquette@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).