From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:12:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: implement optimized percpu variable access
In-Reply-To: <50AFACFF.4000907@gmail.com>
References: <1352604040-10014-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <20121122113401.GC3113@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
 <50AFACFF.4000907@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121123171218.GP5764@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:06:07AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 05:34 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 03:20:40AM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> >>
> >> Use the previously unused TPIDRPRW register to store percpu offsets.
> >> TPIDRPRW is only accessible in PL1, so it can only be used in the kernel.
> >>
> >> This saves 2 loads for each percpu variable access which should yield
> >> improved performance, but the improvement has not been quantified.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/Kbuild   |    1 -
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/smp.c         |    3 +++
> >>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> > 
> > Russell pointed out to me that this patch will break on v6 CPUs if they don't
> > have the thread ID registers and we're running with SMP_ON_UP=y. Looking at
> > the TRMs, the only case we care about is 1136 < r1p0, but it does indeed break
> > there (I have a board on my desk).
> 
> Are there any non ARM Ltd. cores without v6K we need to worry about? I
> wouldn't think there are many 1136 < r1p0 out there (your desk being an
> obvious exception).

And my desk...