From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:04:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Add pinctrl support In-Reply-To: <87y5hn1tey.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <1353557099-21599-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <1353557099-21599-2-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <20121126114511.GE9411@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <87y5hn1tey.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20121127140402.GE4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:55:33PM -0800, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Brown writes: > Mark> Since the driver is happy to continue without the pins why is it > Mark> bothering requesting them in the first place? In other words, this > Mark> should be a hard error. > Sorry, I disagree. As was discussed recently, there's several reasons > why the pinctrl call might fail, and not all are fatal (E.G. pinmux > already setup by bootloader): > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1399756 I'd expect the platform to provide stub mappings for cases where the pinmux code shouldn't do anything. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: