From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@ti.com (Mike Turquette)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:01:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 6/6 v6] cpufreq, highbank: add support for highbank cpufreq
In-Reply-To: <20121128151741.GC28170@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
References: <1351631056-25938-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
 <1354046672-7392-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
 <1354046672-7392-7-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
 <20121128023240.GA28170@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
 <50B60E9C.9000405@calxeda.com>
 <20121128145759.GB28170@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
 <20121128151741.GC28170@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <20121128160115.21126.3841@nucleus>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Shawn Guo (2012-11-28 07:17:44)
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:58:02PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:16:12AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> > > I'd
> > > have to move most of the logic of hb_set_target() into
> > > clk_highbank.c:clk_pll_set_rate() and then add extra logic for when
> > > cpufreq is not enabled/loaded.
> > 
> > You only need to move hb_voltage_change() into cpu clock's .set_rate()
> > hook with no need of checking if cpufreq is enabled or not.
> > 
> Need to also check whether frequency or voltage should be changed first
> in .set_rate() though.
> 
> Shawn
> 

The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than
just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.

I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the
call graph make any clk api calls?  Are you talking over i2c to a
regulator?  If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I
hit when trying to make a general solution.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel