[RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: SMP support for mach-virt

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:40:47PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:55:35PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Why is the pen is needed? It should only be needed for hotplug on
> > systems that can't reset their cores. I'd hope you could design good
> > virtual h/w.
> 
> It's not so much about designing good virtual h/w as it is avoiding tying
> the platform to it. What we don't want is to mandate that in order to boot
> this machine, you *must* implement an emulation of some virtual
> power-controller or SMP booting device. If we go down that route, there's
> less advantage from having the virtual platform in the first place.

There is actually a bigger problem here.  Let's say that you have a
quad SMP platform.  You've arranged for your kernel to boot and only
bring one of those cores online.

You then kexec() or reboot.  As far as the kernel is concerned, those
other two CPUs are not online and are not running any kernel code;
however in reality they could be sitting in this 'pen'.

The memory that these 'offline' CPUs is executing then gets overwritten,
and that's game over for those CPUs.

So, the 'pen' approach in the kernel is fragile, I'd much rather not
have it.  It was fine in the beginning for the initial ARM Ltd SMP
platforms but in this modern age it has no place in real platforms where
there is proper control of the secondary CPUs.