From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:11:42 +0900
Subject: [PATCH V4 0/2] Add DT support for i2s
In-Reply-To: <CAAgF-Bc4t6WL4vswP6CFeSQrPZBmOuYfVt6_JoB1Za9TBX7mvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1354099669-1735-1-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com>
 <CAAgF-Bc4t6WL4vswP6CFeSQrPZBmOuYfVt6_JoB1Za9TBX7mvA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121206041141.GA10867@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:40AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@samsung.com> wrote:

> > Padmavathi Venna (2):
> >   ASoC: Samsung: Get I2S src_clk from clock alias id.
> >   ASoC: SAMSUNG: Add DT support for i2s

> Any comments on DT support for i2s patch?  If not when this patch can be pulled?

Don't send contentless pings.

I still don't really like what's going on with aliases here, I need to
understand why things are structured the way they are to say something
about that.