From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [ARM] head.S change broke platform device registration?
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:49:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121207134929.GA1969@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121207122809.GT14363@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:28:09PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
> Having thought about this for quite a while, I think there's three
> options:
>
> 1. The Sharp Zaurus code is unmaintained. Declare it to be broken, and
> remove all the Sharp code from the kernel so that people aren't tempted
> to think it's something that the kernel supports. (In light of the
> lack of maintainer for these platforms which almost no one knows much
> about, that will lower the maintanence burden on everyone else.)
>
> 2. Revert the hyp-mode support and say that we can't accept _any_ change
> whatsoever to the decompressor head.S through fear that it will cause
> a regression for Sharp Zaurus platforms. (This effectively means we
> can't support virtualization on ARM - which is not acceptable.)
>
> 3. Revert the hyp-mode support and make it conditional on CPUs that have
> hyp-mode support.
>
> Out of those three, (3) is the best way forward. So, unless I hear any
> objections, I'm going to revert 424e5994e63 in mainline, and wait for a
> patch to safe_svcmode_maskall so that it can be switched between the
> hyp-mode version and the non-hyp-mode.
>
> This shouldn't be a problem for the single-zImage people; the break-point
> is the ARMv5/ARMv6 boundary which we're already keeping as separate kernels.
I've posted a separate patch which ought to accomplish the appropriate
change to safe_svc_maskall
([PATCH] ARM: head: Remove boot-time HYP mode check for v5 and below)
I've done a compile-disassemble sanity-check for v5 and v7 to make sure
that the results are sane, but I can't check whether it fixed the
problem for the affected hardware.
Marko, can you give it a try?
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-30 1:38 [ARM] head.S change broke platform device registration? Marko Katić
2012-11-30 10:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-11-30 12:20 ` Marko Katić
2012-11-30 13:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-11-30 14:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-04 21:48 ` Marko Katić
2012-12-04 22:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-05 22:18 ` Marko Katić
2012-12-05 23:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-07 12:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-07 13:49 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2012-12-10 17:23 ` Marko Katić
2012-12-10 17:31 ` Dave Martin
2012-12-10 17:21 ` Marko Katić
2012-12-11 0:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-12 15:55 ` Richard Purdie
2012-12-12 17:22 ` Marko Katić
2012-12-12 17:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-12-12 22:29 ` Richard Purdie
2012-11-30 12:17 ` Dave Martin
2012-11-30 12:28 ` Marko Katić
2012-11-30 12:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-30 13:07 ` Marko Katić
2012-11-30 13:11 ` Marko Katić
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121207134929.GA1969@linaro.org \
--to=dave.martin@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).