From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pratikp@codeaurora.org (Pratik Patel) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:39:16 -0800 Subject: Coresight bus and drivers from CodeAurora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20121211213916.GB7214@pratikp-linux.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi Pratik, > > recently my colleague Magnus (@ST-Ericsson) found this bus and > implementations for the ARM Coresight and drivers for the ARM Coresight > blocks ETB, ETM, Funnel, Replicator, STM, TMC and TPIU. The > code is here: > https://www.codeaurora.org/gitweb/quic/le/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=tree;f=drivers/coresight;h=f0221ea9a55c1e8bcd63f36ec28abb6d5406e63d;hb=refs/heads/msm-3.4 > > What is your intention with this? Do you have any intention to mainline? > Thanks for the quick evaluation. I will be working on cleaning up the drivers for upstream submission in the coming weeks. > We can see it has references to Qualcomm in the device tree strings even > though they are ARM Coresight HW blocks, for example, so some changes > are likely necessary, and such bindings should pass the devicetree-discuss > list. > Yes, will clean it up. > Will: what is ARM Ltd. position on these blocks and their drivers? Any plans > from your side? > > Douglas: look another STM driver... :-) > > John Stultz has recently been working on some PTM extensions > submitted by Arve Hj?nnev?g as well, relating quite closely to this. > > The design is nice, but maybe this is one of the few cases where the > drivers should actually live under arch/arm/common/* or similar. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel