From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:11:17 +0000 Subject: FW: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Gate the clock in runtime suspend to save power In-Reply-To: References: <25B60CDC2F704E4E9D88FFD52780CB4C08B00BD3B1@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> Message-ID: <20121213101117.GF14363@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:04:46AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Anyway, this need to be thought of as future step, since this patch is > not changing anything to that sequence as Kevin also is pointing out. Given that Kevin is talking about stuff in sdhci as if it affects MMCI, and that neither of you have picked that up, you're *still* not gaining any confidence from me that you're actually thinking about the changes you're making. So I'm not really caring about how many acks your patches get, I'm still going to be reluctant to apply them without thinking about them for a bit.