From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:41:40 +0000 Subject: [RFC 2/5] ARM: dts: Add Cross Trigger Interface binding In-Reply-To: <1355348588-22318-3-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> References: <1355348588-22318-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1355348588-22318-3-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> Message-ID: <20121213174139.GA12946@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:43:05PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > Adds a device-tree binding for the ARM Cross Trigger Interface (CTI). > The ARM Cross Trigger Interface provides a way to route events between > processor modules. For example, on OMAP4430 we use the CTI module to > route PMU events to the GIC interrupt module. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4a0e2d3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cti.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > +* ARM Cross Trigger Interface (CTI) > + > +The ARM Cross Trigger Interface provides a way to route events between > +processor modules. For example, debug events from one processor can be > +broadcasted to other processors. The events that can be routed between > +processors are specific to the device. > + > +Required properties: > + > +- compatible: Should be "arm,primecell". > +- interrupts: Interrupt associated with CTI module. > +- reg: Contains timer register address range (base > + address and length). > +- arm,cti-name: A unique name for the CTI module, that will be > + used when requesting the CTI module instance. > + > + > +Optional properties: > + > +- arm-primecell-periphid: Primecell peripheral ID associated with CTI > + module. For multi-cluster systems, I wouldn't be surprised to see multiple CTI instances, each with different CPU affinities. Can we include an affinity property following Mark's proposed binding? http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137290.html Will