From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:30:28 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 01/23] mfd: omap-usb-host: get rid of cpu_is_omap..() macros In-Reply-To: <20121214005450.GO26699@sortiz-mobl> References: <1355134833-5199-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1355134833-5199-2-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20121213214949.GH4989@atomide.com> <20121214005450.GO26699@sortiz-mobl> Message-ID: <20121214183027.GC4989@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Samuel Ortiz [121213 16:57]: > Hi Tony, > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 01:49:49PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > > > * Roger Quadros [121210 02:23]: > > > Instead of using cpu_is_omap..() macros in the device driver we > > > rely on information provided in the platform data. > > > > > > The only information we need is whether the USB Host module has > > > a single ULPI bypass control bit for all ports or individual bypass > > > control bits for each port. OMAP3 REV2.1 and earlier have the former. > > > > I'd like to apply this patch as a fix so I can finally nuke plat/cpu.h > > for omaps by -rc1 before more drivers start using it again. > > > > That is assuming nobody else is planning on merging this series for > > v3.8 presumably. > This should go into 3.9, yes. OK looks like you have all the necessary acks except for one clock change. I replied to that one. > > Want to ack this one? > Looks fine to me: > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz Thanks, I'll queue that one and then after -rc1 hopefully you have all the necessary acks to queue this one via your mfd tree. Regards, Tony