linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] spi: remove check for bits_per_word on transfer from low level driver
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:24:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121219162433.1E1E43E0BCF@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355820943-25228-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>

On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:25:43 +0530, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
> The spi core make sure that each transfer structure have the proper
> setting for bits_per_word before calling low level transfer APIs.
> 
> Hence it is no more require to check again in low level driver for
> this field whether this is set correct or not. Removing such code
> from low level driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c b/drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c
> index d5a3cbb..550b5f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-txx9.c
> @@ -189,9 +189,8 @@ static void txx9spi_work_one(struct txx9spi *c, struct spi_message *m)
>  		unsigned int len = t->len;
>  		unsigned int wsize;
>  		u32 speed_hz = t->speed_hz ? : spi->max_speed_hz;
> -		u8 bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word ? : spi->bits_per_word;
> +		u8 bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word;
>  
> -		bits_per_word = bits_per_word ? : 8;
>  		wsize = bits_per_word >> 3; /* in bytes */
>  
>  		if (prev_speed_hz != speed_hz
> @@ -316,9 +315,8 @@ static int txx9spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *m)
>  	/* check each transfer's parameters */
>  	list_for_each_entry (t, &m->transfers, transfer_list) {
>  		u32 speed_hz = t->speed_hz ? : spi->max_speed_hz;
> -		u8 bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word ? : spi->bits_per_word;
> +		u8 bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word;
>  
> -		bits_per_word = bits_per_word ? : 8;

Have you verified here that bits_per_word can never be '0' here? What is
the path that ensures spi->bits_per_word (and hence t->bits_per_word) is
set to 8 here?

Otherwise the patch looks good. Thanks for doing this work.

g.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-19 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-18  8:55 [PATCH V2] spi: remove check for bits_per_word on transfer from low level driver Laxman Dewangan
2012-12-19 16:24 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-12-20  6:03   ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-12-22  9:54     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121219162433.1E1E43E0BCF@localhost \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).