From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clockevents: Add generic timer broadcast receiver
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:59:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130102105919.GA21978@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D433AA.6070606@ti.com>
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:02:18AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 05:36 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently the broadcast mechanism used for timers is abstracted by a
> > function pointer on struct clock_event_device. As the fundamental
> > mechanism for broadcast is architecture-specific, this ties each
> > clock_event_device driver to a single architecture, even where the
> > driver is otherwise generic.
> >
> > This patch adds a standard path for the receipt of timer broadcasts, so
> > drivers and/or architecture backends need not manage redundant lists of
> > timers for the purpose of routing broadcast timer ticks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/clockchips.h | 4 ++++
> > kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/clockchips.h b/include/linux/clockchips.h
> > index 8a7096f..e1089aa 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/clockchips.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/clockchips.h
> > @@ -161,6 +161,10 @@ clockevents_calc_mult_shift(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 freq, u32 minsec)
> > extern void clockevents_suspend(void);
> > extern void clockevents_resume(void);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> > +extern int tick_receive_broadcast(void);
> > +#endif
> > +
> As mentioned in earlier patch, CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> isn't must for SMP kernel and hence when build with
> !GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST, $subject patch will break the build.
I'd assumed that the broadcast receive path would be ifdef'd on
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST, and thus this wouldn't be a problem.
Though I guess it probably makes arch/platform code a bit nicer if it doesn't
have to ifdef everything.
> Below is the fix for the same. Feel free to fold it if you agree.
Will do.
> diff --git a/include/linux/clockchips.h b/include/linux/clockchips.h
> index 6634652..921568b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clockchips.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clockchips.h
> @@ -168,6 +168,11 @@ extern void tick_broadcast(const struct cpumask *mask);
> #define tick_broadcast NULL
> #endif
> extern int tick_receive_broadcast(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int tick_receive_broadcast(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-02 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 12:06 [RFC PATCH 0/5] clockevents: decouple broadcast mechanism from drivers Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 12:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] ARM: remove useless guard in smp.c Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 18:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-19 9:40 ` Mark Rutland
2012-12-21 10:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-02 11:14 ` Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 12:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] clockevents: Add generic timer broadcast receiver Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 22:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-19 10:19 ` Mark Rutland
2012-12-21 10:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-02 10:59 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2012-12-18 12:06 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] ARM: Use generic timer broadcast receive Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 12:06 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] clockevents: Add generic timer broadcast function Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 22:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-19 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2012-12-18 12:06 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] ARM: Add generic timer broadcast support Mark Rutland
2012-12-21 10:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] clockevents: decouple broadcast mechanism from drivers Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-02 11:41 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130102105919.GA21978@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).